Sound off….Is Kingston Ready for Roundabouts?

Kingston Roundabout
In my introduction a couple of days ago, I indicated that I was a fan of traffic circles. That was, in fact, a poor choice of words, as what I am really in favour of are yield at entry roundabouts vice traffic circles. “What’s the difference?!” I hear you exclaim, they make me dizzy and are probably unsafe and do they really work as advertised? If they are so good, why aren’t they in use in Kingston? Why did Kingston eliminate the traffic circle at Princess and Bath?

First let’s address the differences, then dispel any fears you might have regarding their safety, and demonstrate some additional benefits. Finally I will propose one or two locations to try them out and challenge you to sound off – do you like them? Hate them? Why?.

cross posted at Junior Annex.

Traffic circles (or rotaries as they are sometimes known) are quite often multi lane one way circular traffic patterns with multiple entries and exits – they are often quite large and intimidating. Due to their large circumference, traffic within the circle can move at high speeds which can intimidate drivers. Roundabouts by comparison are small radius traffic control installations with the following common features – (1) yield at entry – that is traffic within the circle has the right of way; (2) due to their small circumference, traffic entering and moving through the roundabout moves at lower speeds thus reducing both the incidence and severity of accidents; and (3) they are often used to replace signalised junctions at medium volume intersections.

Roundabouts offer marked safety improvements in at least two significant areas – vehicle to vehicle collisions and vehicle to pedestrian collisions. The number and severity of vehicle collisions has been demonstrated to decrease, particularly as roundabouts eliminate both head on and left turn accidents. This is not to say that there are no accidents at all, but rather that roundabouts reduce the potential relative speed of vehicle to vehicle accidents resulting in considerably less insurance adjusted claims. Secondly, vehicle to pedestrian accidents are much reduced due to the elimination of left turns (a surprising source of many vehicle to pedestrian accidents).

Finally, what added benefits do roundabouts offer? Significantly, traffic continues to flow rather than to stop altogether – numerous studies have demonstrated that when traffic continues to flow, even at a reduced speed in certain areas, the total trip time is shortened. Roundabouts contribute to a decrease in vehicle generated pollution as idle times are eliminated, and the higher consumption generated by acceleration following a green traffic signal is reduced or eliminated altogether.

Where to start? I suggest two trial intersections, one in the east end and one in the west end. Replace the traffic signals at signalised intersections such as Craftsman (the back gate to CFB Kingston) and Highway 15 and in the west end at Midland and the Walmart entrance with roundabouts.

Thank you for reading Kingstonist! We need your help...

Can we count on your support of as little as $2/month to keep us going?

17 Comments

  1. leifer January 10, 2009
  2. junior January 10, 2009
  3. wooby January 10, 2009
  4. Harvey Kirkpatrick January 10, 2009
  5. RicoJ January 10, 2009
  6. Gordo January 11, 2009
  7. Hiero January 12, 2009
  8. Rhiannon January 12, 2009
  9. barbj8 January 12, 2009
  10. Peter GB March 26, 2009
  11. ryant67 March 31, 2009
  12. 4jeg July 15, 2009
  13. chris September 8, 2009
  14. Dave T January 15, 2010
  15. GeoffWessex January 16, 2010
    • Harvey Kirkpatrick January 16, 2010
  16. M. I. January 17, 2019

Leave a Reply