<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Art of Distraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingstonist.com/2010/02/04/the-art-of-distraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2010/02/04/the-art-of-distraction/</link>
	<description>News, Politics, Events, Music, Art, Theatre, Restaurants, Sports, Environment, Everything and Anything in Kingston, Ontario.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2010/02/04/the-art-of-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=4500#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>I would be interested to know what the nataional per capita for accidents attributed to cell phone, gps, eating etc.. is.  How does Canada rank in comparison to other countries?  And to take that one step further, how does Kingston rank against other Canadian cities? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested to know what the nataional per capita for accidents attributed to cell phone, gps, eating etc.. is.  How does Canada rank in comparison to other countries?  And to take that one step further, how does Kingston rank against other Canadian cities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2010/02/04/the-art-of-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=4500#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>I would love a link to some of those studies/articles.  Agreed that this law is catering to the lowest common denominator, but that&#039;s the sort of thing we do in the name of public safety.  Just take a look at the warning labels on the products we use.  Who in their right mind would think it&#039;s a good idea to spray Windex in their eyes?  And sleeping pills...thanks for letting us know that you cause drowsiness. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love a link to some of those studies/articles.  Agreed that this law is catering to the lowest common denominator, but that&#039;s the sort of thing we do in the name of public safety.  Just take a look at the warning labels on the products we use.  Who in their right mind would think it&#039;s a good idea to spray Windex in their eyes?  And sleeping pills&#8230;thanks for letting us know that you cause drowsiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying_Monkey</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2010/02/04/the-art-of-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying_Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=4500#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>The basic problem is that being inside a car with all its safety features, warmth, music etc. makes you feel invulnerable. It also makes you less attuned to and distanced from the comparative vulnerability of other people - especially cyclists and pedestrians. Keeping down the distractions certainly helps, but it doesn&#039;t address that question of the psychological distance from others. 
 
As a cyclist, I see plenty of people on bikes doing stupid things, but its far harder on a bike to tune out the world, and almost anything you do is likely to rebound on you rather than do harm to someone else. And the list of ludicrously dangerous things I see drivers doing as a matter of course just gets longer and longer.  
 
However the things that are much better in Canada over the UK (where I came from) is that people generally drive much slower and are a bit more polite here. Slower speed and some consideration make a hell of a difference.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The basic problem is that being inside a car with all its safety features, warmth, music etc. makes you feel invulnerable. It also makes you less attuned to and distanced from the comparative vulnerability of other people &#8211; especially cyclists and pedestrians. Keeping down the distractions certainly helps, but it doesn&#039;t address that question of the psychological distance from others. </p>
<p>As a cyclist, I see plenty of people on bikes doing stupid things, but its far harder on a bike to tune out the world, and almost anything you do is likely to rebound on you rather than do harm to someone else. And the list of ludicrously dangerous things I see drivers doing as a matter of course just gets longer and longer.  </p>
<p>However the things that are much better in Canada over the UK (where I came from) is that people generally drive much slower and are a bit more polite here. Slower speed and some consideration make a hell of a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Cho</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2010/02/04/the-art-of-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=4500#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>I think that any activity that involves one (or more?) hands being occupied for more than, say, 30 seconds (arbitrarily) is a danger to driving.  Texting, holding a cell phone to your ear, chowing down on a burger, folding intricate origami on your center console... these things all detract from your attention to the road and impact your reaction times.

Now when I eat in a car, I usually pick up whatever item, take a quick bite, and then put it down again.  But I can see how it&#039;d be a problem if people were just holding the wheel in one hand, clutching a Big Mac in the other the whole time.

This is one of those issues where they feel they have to target the lowest common denominator in the name of public safety, I think - I saw a guy the other day with a cell phone on one ear (held by his shoulder), a Blackberry in one hand and a pen in the other, writing down something on a pad which was being held against his steering wheel.  I don&#039;t know what magical appendage he might have been driving with.  This was downtown Vancouver, one of the craziest places to drive that I&#039;ve been so far in Canada.

But I&#039;ve read multiple articles that state that, statistically, the ban on cell phones and GPS have not reduced accidents.  I wonder how much of that&#039;s because people who are bad drivers are still bad drivers regardless of whether they&#039;re chatting or not, and how much of it is because most people don&#039;t seem to care about the law change and continue on with old habits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that any activity that involves one (or more?) hands being occupied for more than, say, 30 seconds (arbitrarily) is a danger to driving.  Texting, holding a cell phone to your ear, chowing down on a burger, folding intricate origami on your center console&#8230; these things all detract from your attention to the road and impact your reaction times.</p>
<p>Now when I eat in a car, I usually pick up whatever item, take a quick bite, and then put it down again.  But I can see how it&#8217;d be a problem if people were just holding the wheel in one hand, clutching a Big Mac in the other the whole time.</p>
<p>This is one of those issues where they feel they have to target the lowest common denominator in the name of public safety, I think &#8211; I saw a guy the other day with a cell phone on one ear (held by his shoulder), a Blackberry in one hand and a pen in the other, writing down something on a pad which was being held against his steering wheel.  I don&#8217;t know what magical appendage he might have been driving with.  This was downtown Vancouver, one of the craziest places to drive that I&#8217;ve been so far in Canada.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve read multiple articles that state that, statistically, the ban on cell phones and GPS have not reduced accidents.  I wonder how much of that&#8217;s because people who are bad drivers are still bad drivers regardless of whether they&#8217;re chatting or not, and how much of it is because most people don&#8217;t seem to care about the law change and continue on with old habits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2010/02/04/the-art-of-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-2214</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=4500#comment-2214</guid>
		<description>Fully agree, but that leaves the law up to way too much interpretation.  So instead of being pulled over for doing x (talking on a cell phone, eating, etc...) a police officer would have to make a judgment call as to how distracted you seemed.  Let&#039;s hope that&#039;s not a delicious sandwich, else your enjoyment could be misinterpreted as distraction.  I suppose that&#039;s all to say, eating, for some, could easily be as distracting as talking on a cell phone. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully agree, but that leaves the law up to way too much interpretation.  So instead of being pulled over for doing x (talking on a cell phone, eating, etc&#8230;) a police officer would have to make a judgment call as to how distracted you seemed.  Let&#039;s hope that&#039;s not a delicious sandwich, else your enjoyment could be misinterpreted as distraction.  I suppose that&#039;s all to say, eating, for some, could easily be as distracting as talking on a cell phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Pedlar</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2010/02/04/the-art-of-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Pedlar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=4500#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>As I was driving home this week trying to eat a giant sandwich from Stuff&#039;d I was wondering how it is illegal for me to talk on my cell phone, yet perfectly legal for me to eat? 
 
I feel like eating and driving produces worse results for me personally than talking on my phone (even though I do use hands free now).  I feel that the legislation should have given police a little more leniency to pull people over for doing anything stupid while they are supposed to be driving, including eating giant sandwiches.  
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was driving home this week trying to eat a giant sandwich from Stuff&#039;d I was wondering how it is illegal for me to talk on my cell phone, yet perfectly legal for me to eat? </p>
<p>I feel like eating and driving produces worse results for me personally than talking on my phone (even though I do use hands free now).  I feel that the legislation should have given police a little more leniency to pull people over for doing anything stupid while they are supposed to be driving, including eating giant sandwiches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

