Get Smart, Meters
When it comes to improving eco-friendly practises, Kingston has made some modest and forward thinking strides over the past year. We’ve mentioned the introduction of the organic waste recycling program, ongoing rain barrel initiative, as well as the launch of our neighbouring wind farm, all of which have helped cast the Limestone City in a greener light. Accordingly, Kingston is tackling environmental issues more seriously, and ambitiously striving to become Canada’s most sustainable city. While we have a ways to go before the local food movement, LEED building standards, pedestrian friendly days, and rooftop solar arrays become the norm, another significant sustainable change is on the horizon.
The Ontario Government has pledged that by the end of 2010, every home and business in the province will be equipped with a revolutionary smart meter, which is expected to improve energy conservation. Presently, existing meters have to be read manually, and thus your monthly statement reflects either an estimate or a top-up of your overall consumption. Smart meters will speed up reporting through continuous, wireless communication of your electricity usage to Utilities Kingston. In the end, the expectation is that consumers will manage consumption so that it does not coincide with peak times, which are subject to higher billing rates. As detailed by CBC:
People with smart meters shall be charged a sliding scale of rates based on the time of day power is used. The prices range from a high of 9.3 cents per kWh to a low of 2.9 cents per kWh. It would cost much less to use major appliances after 10 p.m. In the summer, it would make sense to use the air conditioner less during the afternoon. Holding off until the weekend to do laundry would also save money.
The economic and environmental savings provided via the smart grid aren’t enough for some critics who believe that smart meters are too expensive to install, ranging from $250 to $500 per unit, which could result in minimal to zero financial savings. Furthermore, significant concerns have also been raised about privacy, as the smart system essentially gives unknown entities a window into your home. Although Utilities Kingston has yet address these concerns, I expect that they’ll be rolling out a limited awareness campaign well before they commence city-wide installation of smart meters. And in the end, whether you like it or not, by 2011 smart meters will become another feather in Kingston’s sustainable cap.
Will the advent smart meters cause you to get off the grid, or do you welcome the potential savings? Let us know by dropping off a few comments in the box below. Thanks and credit to Duke Energy for the photo capturing a smart meter in the wild.
Thanks for the yoga article, Caitlin. I think I might like to now become a yogini! 
It may be a bit of a stretch to say that Richardson Beach is totally unsafe, but given the lack ...
Harv,
I can't say I agree with you saying swimming in lake O is unsafe for your health. Plus, ...
Leo LaFleur hasn't been closed that long...just since the end of the season last year. From what the lifeguards ...
In most caricatures there is an element of truth, no? A lot of planners DO frame the debate in this ...
Thanks, Dave. Needless to say, I disagree! I taught urban planning for six years and that is a caricatured description ...
That's a great story, I had no idea what a neat place Luke's is. If I'm ever brave enough to ...
Comment by michaelwc on 24 November 2009:
Seems to me that the Whig ran a story not long ago about smart meters. Apparantly there have been complaints about them overcharging. My main concern with them is just that. Right now I count on the same average utilities bill every month. I can’t afford to have major flucuations in my utilities bill. A few people I have talked to have the same concern.
Comment by Harvey Kirkpatrick on 24 November 2009:
@michaelwc If you find a link to that article, please send it along as I could not. Otherwise, if you’re concerned about having a consistent bill, you can always elect to pay a flat monthly rate. A friend of mine who moved into a new home did this to avoid monthly fluctuations, and after the first year, he had a $500 dollar credit on his utilities account. The second year, he adjusted the monthly rate so to get it in line with what he expected to use based on the previous year.
Comment by michaelwc on 24 November 2009:
Here is the article that I was refering to earlier. Generally I do pay a flat rate just slighty above what my monthly average bill is. Basically depending on what time of year I put 50 or 75 each month. This usually works out perfect for me. However I have been burned in the past(I was one of those silly people who switched providers thinking it would be cheaper but instead was just double billed for a year) when it came to utilites and dread any more changes. Hopefully all the possible kinks are worked out of the system before we install this.
Comment by Gordo on 24 November 2009:
Here it is, Harvey
We’ve had the smart meter here (West End) for more than a year, but I don’t know when we’re supposed to kick into the tiered pricing.
I don’t imagine it will make an awful lot of difference to us: we already schedule things like the dishwasher and laundry for off-peak times.
Comment by Laura on 24 November 2009:
Here’s the article.
Comment by Leif on 24 November 2009:
@Harvey
Two related stories in the Whig in the last month
Steep hydro bill shocks family
A real power struggle
Comment by Harvey Kirkpatrick on 25 November 2009:
Thanks to the four of you for hooking up that link. Clearly I’m not a regular Whig reader to know that they’d already broached the subject.
Comment by That Guy on 26 November 2009:
I would characterize these strides as more than “modest” – the way to progress is through encouragement of the good stuff.
Comment by Harvey Kirkpatrick on 26 November 2009:
@That Guy When it comes to sustainable practices, more often than not Kingston is following what other communities have already done. In other words, Canada’s most sustainable city is anything but a leader in sustainability. Sure the changes we are making should be applauded, but save for the Wolfe Island Wind Farm (which some don’t consider as belonging to Kingston proper), they are anything but revolutionary. We don’t need to reinvent the wheel with everything we do, but it would be nice to see us come up with at least one original idea.
Comment by That Guy on 1 December 2009:
Ok, so Kingston isn’t bleeding-edge, but I do see an effort. This is especially significant in my estimation considering we’re in an economic downturn/recession/depression (despite what the talking heads say).
As for the “most sustainable city” title, I think it isn’t a helpful one, as competition isn’t what this is about, but rather making steady progress.
Comment by michaelwc on 14 December 2009:
Another linking on the continuing issue of smart meters here in Kingston. More and More I am not looking forward to be put on this system. http://www.thewhig.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2220107
Comment by michaelwc on 14 December 2009:
Here is another one for you guys. I think I am on a smart meter kick today. http://www.thesudburystar.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1589645
I am noticing there is alot of good info about these things out there but that the “downfalls” are conveniently buried. And of course when you do find the bad news…its really bad. IT always seems to be the same thing…More money coming out of our pocket and into the electric company. I know I will be asking my landlord if and when they will be switching to this system and be extra careful/cautious/vigilent.