<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What if Kingston&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingstonist.com/2009/07/08/what-if-kingston-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2009/07/08/what-if-kingston-3/</link>
	<description>News, Politics, Events, Music, Art, Theatre, Restaurants, Sports, Environment, Everything and Anything in Kingston, Ontario.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4jeg</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2009/07/08/what-if-kingston-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>4jeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=2137#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t find pictures, but there&#039;s a brief history right here:

http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~wyatt/alltime/kingston-on.html

...being in Tinajin, China right now, they have a nice half-way streetcar solution. Essentially the actual body looks identical to a modern streetcar, but there is just one track, and the body moves on regular tires - probably saves them a bit of money as they only have to put one rail down. Here&#039;s to hoping!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t find pictures, but there&#8217;s a brief history right here:</p>
<p><a href="http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~wyatt/alltime/kingston-on.html" rel="nofollow">http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~wyatt/alltime/kingston-on.html</a></p>
<p>&#8230;being in Tinajin, China right now, they have a nice half-way streetcar solution. Essentially the actual body looks identical to a modern streetcar, but there is just one track, and the body moves on regular tires &#8211; probably saves them a bit of money as they only have to put one rail down. Here&#8217;s to hoping!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2009/07/08/what-if-kingston-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=2137#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>@4jeg  I totally forgot that Kingston ever had a tram system.  Would love to see some pics if anyone can dig them up.  Perhaps this would be a more viable option than a subway, lightrail etc...  That said, I can already hear the boo&#039;s from the naysayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@4jeg  I totally forgot that Kingston ever had a tram system.  Would love to see some pics if anyone can dig them up.  Perhaps this would be a more viable option than a subway, lightrail etc&#8230;  That said, I can already hear the boo&#8217;s from the naysayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4jeg</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2009/07/08/what-if-kingston-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>4jeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=2137#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>I personally think that we should revive Kingston&#039;s old tram system for Princess! There are old picture from the 1900&#039;s showing this thing barreling down a dirty road (on its tracks of course!).

A lot of cities are installing them, as they&#039;re more cost effective than buses, see here:

http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/05/04/chart-americas-streetcar-renaissance/

(lots more streetcar goodness on that site besides that one)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think that we should revive Kingston&#8217;s old tram system for Princess! There are old picture from the 1900&#8242;s showing this thing barreling down a dirty road (on its tracks of course!).</p>
<p>A lot of cities are installing them, as they&#8217;re more cost effective than buses, see here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/05/04/chart-americas-streetcar-renaissance/" rel="nofollow">http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/05/04/chart-americas-streetcar-renaissance/</a></p>
<p>(lots more streetcar goodness on that site besides that one)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rq</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2009/07/08/what-if-kingston-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>rq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=2137#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>Kingston is more like a few centuries away from incorporating a subway system :) These grand ideas make sense in large cities with  a population in the millions. I think its time to accept that this is a smaller city, and it will never be a Toronto or Montreal. I moved here to get away from Toronto! Instead of all the large scale dreaming, it&#039;s more appropriate to develop attainable goals based on the size of the population, however &quot;unsexy&quot; they may sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kingston is more like a few centuries away from incorporating a subway system :) These grand ideas make sense in large cities with  a population in the millions. I think its time to accept that this is a smaller city, and it will never be a Toronto or Montreal. I moved here to get away from Toronto! Instead of all the large scale dreaming, it&#8217;s more appropriate to develop attainable goals based on the size of the population, however &#8220;unsexy&#8221; they may sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryant67</title>
		<link>http://www.kingstonist.com/2009/07/08/what-if-kingston-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>ryant67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingstonist.com/?p=2137#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>In a large city like Montreal or Toronto, where downtown storespace is very heavily sought after, the underground extension is intelligent, works well, and viable.  

A city the size of Kingston, however, has no practical need for one, lacks the population, tourism, money, and infrastructure to implement such a project.  Cost-prohibitive would be a fitting term I think.  

Let&#039;s leave the big city ideas to the big cities.  :)

Plus, there is always the risk of mole people....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a large city like Montreal or Toronto, where downtown storespace is very heavily sought after, the underground extension is intelligent, works well, and viable.  </p>
<p>A city the size of Kingston, however, has no practical need for one, lacks the population, tourism, money, and infrastructure to implement such a project.  Cost-prohibitive would be a fitting term I think.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s leave the big city ideas to the big cities.  :)</p>
<p>Plus, there is always the risk of mole people&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

